If your Nike Pegasus Plus still feels good, the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 is not an automatic replacement. The new shoe adds a prominent forefoot Air Zoom unit, deeper cushioning and a redesigned upper, but that changes the feel underfoot. The practical question is whether you want more protection and room for daily miles, or prefer the original shoe's lighter, more flexible forefoot. The evidence here comes from the supplied reviews and specifications; Verdosa has not conducted its own wear test.
Cushioning and Ride: More Protection, Different Feel
The original Nike Pegasus Plus uses one continuous ZoomX midsole without a plate or Air unit. Reviewers describe a soft landing and a flexible forefoot, though some found the thin front of the shoe firm or tiring as distance increased. Others enjoyed its direct feel for faster running. That split matters: a runner happy with the original's flexibility may not welcome a stiffer front simply because it is newer. Doctors of Running's original review and Believe in the Run's review illustrate the different reactions.
The Nike Pegasus Plus 2 retains ZoomX but adds a curved Air Zoom unit under the forefoot and roughly more cushioning depth. Doctors of Running found it better protected and most enjoyable around marathon pace. Runner's World described a snappy push-off, yet also noticed a transition between the soft heel and firmer forefoot at some steady paces. Other supplied testers considered the Air unit's effect subtle or found the shoe laboured when running fast. Treat Nike's reported 18% energy-return improvement as a brand claim about its system, not proof that you will run 18% faster.
For easy runs through controlled tempo work, the Plus 2 is the more protective choice on the supplied evidence. For short, quicker outings, the original may still suit runners who prefer less structure. Neither replaces a dedicated racing shoe just because it uses ZoomX.
Fit: Check the Midfoot as Well as the Toe Box
Fit is a stronger reason to switch than a foam claim. The original Nike Pegasus Plus has a Flyknit upper. The supplied reviewers disagree on its forefoot width and lockdown: some found enough room and a secure heel, while others reported a tapered toe, loose midfoot, foot movement or hot spots. One tester said the upper loosened after roughly 30 miles. Those are individual experiences, so the original is not universally narrow or loose.
The Nike Pegasus Plus 2 changes to engineered mesh on a revised last, with a roomier forefoot and a more controlled midfoot in several supplied reviews. That combination could solve problems for someone whose toes felt squeezed while the centre of their foot slid in the first model. It is still a neutral shoe, and the lab-based research calls its toe width narrow to medium rather than a true wide fit. Tongue reports also conflict: some reviewers liked its protection; another found it short and prone to slipping. If fit caused you trouble before, try the Plus 2 with your usual socks and check the tongue and heel after lacing. Doctors of Running's Plus 2 review provides the detailed fit comparison.
Weight, Long Runs and Durability
The Plus 2's extra cushioning and Air unit do not make it a uniformly lighter upgrade. The supplied weights span different men's sizes and measurement methods; one same-size tester found the Plus 2 heavier than his original pair. Use a size-matched measurement if weight is decisive. Several testers found the Plus 2 comfortable over longer runs, while original-model reviewers more often mentioned forefoot or arch fatigue as mileage built. Your own tolerance matters more than a fixed distance limit.
Both shoes put rubber on their main contact zones but leave midfoot foam exposed. One original-model review reported early heel-rubber wear and another documented upper separation in a single pair; those observations cannot establish a failure rate. Plus 2 reviews also disagree: some praise its substantial outsole, while others note wear on exposed foam or average wet grip. Treat either as a road shoe and check the condition of the pair you actually own before replacing it. Running Shoes Guru's original review documents the separation; Doctors of Running's Plus 2 review describes wear in its sample.
Is the Upgrade Worth the Price?
At the reported review/list prices, the Plus 2 does not necessarily cost more than the original did at launch. The research, however, gives conflicting Plus 2 figures: US$165 versus US$170 and £150 versus £155. The original's US$180, £165 and €180 figures come from 2024 reviews, not a current offer. No current Amazon price or Plus 2 euro price was supplied. Compare today's listings in your size and colour before calling either a bargain.
If you already own a comfortable Nike Pegasus Plus, the strongest reason to pay for the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 is a specific complaint: inadequate forefoot protection or troublesome upper hold. If your first pair is worn out and prices are close, the newer fit and cushioning are worth considering. A discounted original remains sensible when its fit and flexible ride are exactly what you want.
Choose Nike Pegasus Plus 2 for cushioned daily miles
Choose the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 if you want more cushioning under the forefoot for regular training, the original lets your foot move inside the upper or crowds your toes, or you prefer a firmer, more structured push-off.
Swipe or scroll to view all 5 product images.
As an Amazon Associate, Verdosa may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Prices may vary
Choose Nike Pegasus Plus for a flexible ride
Choose the Nike Pegasus Plus if your current pair fits securely and you enjoy its natural forefoot flex, most runs are shorter, and its actual sale price makes keeping or replacing it better value.
Swipe or scroll to view all 5 product images.
As an Amazon Associate, Verdosa may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Prices may vary
Final Verdict
Choose the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 if you want a roomier, more secure fit and more protection through daily and longer steady runs, and you accept a more structured forefoot. Choose the Nike Pegasus Plus if its existing fit works, you prefer a flexible ZoomX ride, and a lower current price makes it better value. For a happy owner of the original, fit or forefoot comfort—not the model number alone—should decide the upgrade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 better than the Nike Pegasus Plus?
It is more cushioned and adds forefoot Air Zoom plus a revised upper. Whether that is better depends on your fit and ride preference; the supplied testers disagree on how much extra speed the Air unit provides.
Is the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 lighter?
Do not assume so. The supplied figures refer to different sizes, and one tester found the Plus 2 heavier in a same-size comparison. Check weights in your size.
Which has more room in the toe box?
Multiple supplied reviews find the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 roomier at the forefoot, but a lab measurement still characterises it as narrow to medium. The original's fit impressions vary, so neither is a guaranteed wide-foot option.
Can either shoe handle long runs?
Yes, depending on your comfort. The Plus 2 has more reported underfoot protection and received favourable long-run comments. Several original-model reviewers found its forefoot tiring over longer efforts. Test the shoe over your own intended distance before relying on it for marathon training.
Does the Nike Pegasus Plus 2 have a carbon plate?
No. The supplied research describes ZoomX cushioning and a forefoot Air Zoom unit, with no carbon plate. The original has a full-length ZoomX midsole without an Air unit or plate.
Should I replace a comfortable Nike Pegasus Plus now?
There is no clear reason to replace a comfortable pair early. Consider the Plus 2 when your pair wears out, or sooner if you specifically need more forefoot protection or improved midfoot hold.